Skip to content
Omnikalc

AIMS65: in-hospital mortality risk in upper GI bleeding

Count the five AIMS65 factors, albumin, INR, mental status, systolic pressure and age 65 or more, to estimate in-hospital mortality from acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Updated on
Your inputs

Value out of range

Value out of range

mmHg

Value out of range

years

Value out of range

Results

AIMS65 score

1 / 5

1: intermediate risk
In-hospital mortality in the validation study
1.2%

This calculator is for general information and education. It is not medical advice and does not replace the judgment of a doctor, nurse or pharmacist who knows the full clinical picture.

Vomiting blood, black tarry stools or fainting need emergency care: call 911.

Five simple items

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding comes from the esophagus, stomach or duodenum, most often from a peptic ulcer or from varices in people with cirrhosis. AIMS65, published by John Saltzman and colleagues in 2011, uses five items available within the first hours to estimate the risk of dying in hospital. Each item present scores one point:

  • Albumin below 3.0 g/dL (30 g/L)
  • INR above 1.5
  • altered Mental status: a Glasgow score below 14, disorientation, lethargy or stupor
  • Systolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg or less
  • age 65 or older

Mortality by score

In the validation cohort, in-hospital mortality rose steeply with the score:

AIMS65 score In-hospital mortality
0 0.3%
1 1.2%
2 5.3%
3 10.3%
4 16.5%
5 24.5%

A score of 2 or more is generally considered high risk. These patients need close monitoring, often in an intensive or step-down unit, and an endoscopy within 24 hours, or sooner if they are unstable.

Worked example

A 72-year-old with an albumin of 3.2 g/dL, an INR of 1.2, normal consciousness and a systolic pressure of 110 mmHg scores one point, for age. The expected in-hospital mortality is about 1%. If the same patient became confused and their pressure fell to 88 mmHg, the score would rise to 3 and the risk to about 10%.

AIMS65 or Glasgow-Blatchford?

The two scores answer different questions. The Glasgow-Blatchford score predicts whether a patient will need a transfusion, endoscopic therapy or surgery, and a score of 0 or 1 identifies people who can safely be managed at home. AIMS65 is easier to remember and better at predicting death, which makes it useful for deciding the level of care. Guidelines such as those of the American College of Gastroenterology favor the Glasgow-Blatchford score for early discharge decisions.

Why albumin and INR matter

Low albumin reflects poor nutrition, chronic illness or liver disease, and a raised INR often signals cirrhosis or anticoagulant treatment. Both point to a patient less able to withstand blood loss, which is why they predict mortality even more than the severity of the bleed itself.

Frequently asked questions

What does AIMS65 stand for?

Albumin below 3.0 g/dL, INR above 1.5, altered Mental status, Systolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg or less, and age 65 or older. Each factor scores one point, for a total of 0 to 5.

What is AIMS65 used for?

It estimates the risk of death in hospital for patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, for example from an ulcer or varices. It was developed by Saltzman and colleagues in 2011 from a large US database.

How is AIMS65 different from the Glasgow-Blatchford score?

Glasgow-Blatchford predicts the need for a transfusion, endoscopic treatment or surgery and is best at finding very low-risk patients who can go home. AIMS65 is simpler and is better suited to predicting mortality.

Can AIMS65 be calculated before blood tests?

Only partly. Mental status, blood pressure and age are known at the bedside, but albumin and INR need blood tests, which are usually available within an hour or two.

Was this calculator helpful?

Thanks for your feedback!

Results are estimates provided for information purposes. They do not replace professional advice.