Skip to content
Omnikalc

Astrophotography pixel scale and field of view calculator

Compute the image scale of a camera on a telescope in arcseconds per pixel, the field of view and whether your setup is well matched to the local seeing.

Updated on
Your inputs
µm

Value out of range

mm

Value out of range

px

Value out of range

px

Value out of range

Binning
″

Value out of range

Results

Pixel scale

1.29 ″/px

Pixels across the seeing disk (FWHM ÷ scale)

1.93

Well sampled: about 2 to 3 pixels across a star's FWHM
Field of view, width
134.6 ′
Field of view, height
90.0 ′
Field of view diagonal
2.70 °

What pixel scale means

In astrophotography, the pixel scale (also called image scale or sampling) is the patch of sky each pixel of the camera covers, measured in arcseconds per pixel. It depends only on the size of the pixels and the focal length of the telescope.

The formula

Pixel scale (″/px) = 206.265 × pixel size (µm) ÷ focal length (mm)

The constant 206.265 comes from the number of arcseconds in a radian (206,265), divided by 1,000 to match the units. Binning 2×2 doubles the effective pixel size, and so doubles the scale.

With a camera of 3.76 µm pixels on a 600 mm refractor, the scale is 206.265 × 3.76 ÷ 600 = 1.29″ per pixel. A 6,248 × 4,176 pixel sensor then covers about 134.6′ × 90.0′, or roughly 2.2° × 1.5°: four full Moons side by side.

Matching the scale to the seeing

The atmosphere blurs every star into a disk whose width, the seeing (FWHM), is typically 2 to 3″ at an average site and 1″ or less on the best mountains. Sampling theory and experience suggest putting 2 to 3 pixels across the FWHM:

Pixels per FWHM Diagnosis What to do
under 1.5 Undersampled: square stars Longer focal length or smaller pixels
1.5 to 3.5 Well sampled Nothing
over 3.5 Oversampled: signal wasted Bin 2×2 or use a reducer

Undersampling is not always a problem: wide-field nebula images often accept it to frame large targets. Dithering between exposures and drizzle integration recover some resolution.

Using the result

  • Choose a focal reducer or Barlow by comparing the scale with your typical seeing.
  • Check the field of view against the size of your target before buying a camera.
  • Plate-solving software also needs the approximate scale to identify a star field quickly.

Remember to enter the effective focal length: a 0.8× reducer turns a 600 mm telescope into 480 mm.

Frequently asked questions

What is a good pixel scale for deep-sky imaging?

For typical seeing of 2 to 3 arcseconds, a scale of about 1 to 1.5 arcseconds per pixel is well matched. Under excellent skies, 0.7 to 1 arcsecond per pixel can resolve more detail.

Does binning change the field of view?

No. Binning combines pixels, which doubles the pixel scale and halves the resolution in pixels, but the sensor still covers the same patch of sky.

Where do I find my camera's pixel size?

It is listed in the camera's specifications in micrometers, for example 3.76 µm for the popular IMX571 and IMX455 sensors or 2.9 µm for the IMX585.

How does a focal reducer affect the pixel scale?

A reducer shortens the effective focal length, so each pixel covers more sky. A 0.8× reducer increases the arcseconds per pixel by 25% and widens the field by the same factor.

Was this calculator helpful?

Thanks for your feedback!

Results are estimates provided for information purposes. They do not replace professional advice.